Is Simple Living a Choice if You Never Had the Option?

Nadia had read the book. The one about the joy of tidying, the art of owning less, the freedom that allegedly comes when you let go of things. She had read it in her small apartment in Columbus, the one she shared with her sister, surrounded by objects that were already modest in number because there was no other option. She felt something reading it. Not inspiration, exactly. Something more like discomfort that took her a while to name.

She had grown up in a family that reused everything. Bags, containers, the good foil. Her grandmother had grown her own vegetables not because of wellness philosophy but because that was where the food came from. They had lived what a whole industry of books now described as a dream, and they had not experienced it as a dream.

The discomfort she couldn't quite place

Nadia wasn't angry at the books. She understood what they were trying to say: that in a culture of excess, the deliberate choice to step back from accumulation can be clarifying, even freeing. She believed that. She also believed that something was getting flattened in the telling.

For about ninety percent of the world's population, she thought, simple living isn't a lifestyle category. It's just life. Modest homes, shared space, reused materials, careful spending, fewer possessions because possessions cost money and money was finite. The philosophical rebranding of this as a desirable aesthetic was something you could only fully notice if you had seen both sides of it.

She started asking people about this, quietly, in the way you do when a question is sitting with you. What she heard surprised her a little.

What the distinction actually changes

The most useful thing anyone said to her came from a friend who had moved to the US from the Philippines in her twenties. She said: the difference isn't in the behavior. It's in the relationship to it. People who live simply because they have no alternative are not practicing simplicity. They are surviving scarcity. The two produce very different inner states, and pretending they are the same thing obscures both.

The American Psychological Association's research on poverty and chronic stress supports this: material scarcity activates stress responses that are cognitively and emotionally taxing in ways that chosen simplicity simply does not. Choosing to own fewer things when you could own more is a fundamentally different experience from having fewer things because more is not accessible.

That didn't make the choice meaningless. It made it specific.

What Nadia decided to do with it

She kept reading the books. She found real value in them. Not the parts that romanticized what her family had never chosen, but the parts that were actually about attention: what you buy and why, what you consume and what you bring into your life, whether the things around you are there because you considered them or because you were marketed to effectively.

She started thinking of simplicity less as an aesthetic and more as a practice of paying attention. That reframe helped.

Questions she started asking before acquiring things

• Do I need this, or did something make me feel like I need it?
• What am I actually trying to feel by having this?
• Does this replace something, or is it additional?
• Will I want to store this in a year?
• Would I buy this if no one would ever see it?

She still had the apartment with her sister. She still didn't own much. But the things she did own now felt considered rather than default, and that small difference, it turned out, changed how the apartment felt to come home to.

The thing she wanted to say out loud

Nadia wrote something short about this for a class she was taking. Her professor asked her to expand it into a longer piece. She wasn't sure it was worth it. Then she kept meeting people who had the same quiet discomfort and had never heard it named.

What she most wanted to say was something simple: the experience of living modestly because you have no choice is not behind the curve. It is not something to be discovered. Mental wellbeing research increasingly confirms what many communities have always lived: that sufficiency, connection, and purpose matter more than accumulation. What is new is not the wisdom. What is new is who is writing it down.

She also wanted to say: intention makes a difference, but not the difference it sometimes claims to make. Owning less does not automatically produce peace. Peace is harder than that. Plenty of people with stripped-down apartments and capsule wardrobes are completely miserable. And plenty of people with crowded homes full of objects that tell stories are doing fine.

Where she landed

Nadia is not a minimalist, in the branded sense of the word. She is a person who thinks about what she owns and why. She is suspicious of systems that turn a basic human orientation toward sufficiency into a product. She is also suspicious of her own suspicion, which she knows can become its own kind of performance.

She owns one houseplant. It is doing badly. She is trying.

Thinking about a city that matches how you want to live? Our vibe matching tool can help you find places built for a slower pace.